Gman wrote:
Honestly it depends on how much it's been fired. A weapon that's had 100,000 rounds through it isn't going to be as accurate as one that's only had 10,000 -- and that weapon isn't going to be as accurate as one that's only had 1,000 fired through it.

I've got a Springfield 1903-A3, which is, in my opinion, one of the best military service weapons ever made. It's a .30-06, and the iron sights are accurate to 800yds. Put a scope on it, and (depending on the shooter) it's accurate up to 1500 or more. We're talking about a weapon that was issued for service in WWI and WWII.

Basically, the "age" of the weapon doesn't really matter as much as how much the weapon has been used and how well it's been maintained. Chances are, if the weapon saw combat, it's not going to be as great as one that didn't see combat.

you're a liar.


we all know the best rifle is made by Accuracy International.


i'll give you a hint.

using it makes you a whore.