| Author |
Message |
|
Crzyninja
[n00b] Member
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:00 pm Posts: 2410 Location: california
|
 DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
this really sucks i was excited abou this game till i read the reviews
_________________Goodkat wrote: ... and I'll leave you with a nice warm glass of go F*CK yourself. acid_rain wrote: I am not going to explain my reasoning for anything, because I simply don't have to.
|
| Tue Jun 21, 2011 3:07 pm |
|
 |
|
Omega
Raging Knight
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:00 pm Posts: 3321 Location: On the Savannah, GA
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
Yeah, I heard nothing but bad stuff about this game. I mean, it was pretty unrealistic to think that it'd be amazing after all of the bru haha surrounding its release and the time it actually took to release it. Duke Nukem helped get the FPS ball rolling, but how can we expect it to revolutionize the genre?
|
| Tue Jun 21, 2011 3:09 pm |
|
 |
|
Dieus
[n00b] Member
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:00 pm Posts: 1045
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
Blame it on 3D Realm for F*CKING it up but I have fate in next Duke Nukem game seeing that its all will be Gearbox.
|
| Tue Jun 21, 2011 3:59 pm |
|
 |
|
Crzyninja
[n00b] Member
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:00 pm Posts: 2410 Location: california
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
i wasnt exspecing a amaxing nxt gen game but somthing that would be F*CKING fun as hell
_________________Goodkat wrote: ... and I'll leave you with a nice warm glass of go F*CK yourself. acid_rain wrote: I am not going to explain my reasoning for anything, because I simply don't have to.
|
| Tue Jun 21, 2011 6:20 pm |
|
 |
|
LeCoq
[n00b] Member
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:00 am Posts: 3031
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
The reviews pushed it a little far though, it's not THAT bad, the multiplayer blows, the graphics aren't too great, but the game itself is still fun (minus the driving part that lasts forever). It's a Duke Nukem game, it's fun, you'd laugh, not the game of the year though.
|
| Tue Jun 21, 2011 6:34 pm |
|
 |
|
virus
[n00b] Member
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:00 am Posts: 1918 Location: Miami, FL
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
Ive played the game and its not bad at all. I think all these reviewers were expecting MW3 instead of Duke Nukem.
|
| Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:14 pm |
|
 |
|
.:SenSui:.
Spammer Hopeful
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 8:16 pm Posts: 393
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
I played the Demo and have seen better piles of cow shit than this...
_________________
|
| Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:24 pm |
|
 |
|
Crzyninja
[n00b] Member
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:00 pm Posts: 2410 Location: california
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
thats what your mom said when you were born but its ok
_________________Goodkat wrote: ... and I'll leave you with a nice warm glass of go F*CK yourself. acid_rain wrote: I am not going to explain my reasoning for anything, because I simply don't have to.
|
| Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:24 am |
|
 |
|
cybrslsh
Game Server Admin
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:19 am Posts: 1017
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
after all the shit this game went through, i really didnt expect it to be all that great. On the other hand, from the screen shots i've seen, there should be some hilarious shit.
_________________검둥이 
|
| Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:46 am |
|
 |
|
Sandman
fomenta's bitch
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:53 pm Posts: 2811 Location: giving bitches wet willies
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
After all the hype about it, its pretty disappointing
_________________Am I evil? Yes I am Am I evil? I am man, yes I am
|
| Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:30 pm |
|
 |
|
SEIJIsaurusREX
[n00b] Member
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:00 am Posts: 457 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
 DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
I dont understand what the issue is here. It was pretty clear that this game was developed in a different era. It's engine didnt undergo a redux or overhaul once it reached 2010, let alone 2000.
On top of that, it wasn't built to be a evolutionary change of the genre. It was built to be like how Super Mario Bros. And the new Donkey Kong was for the Wii; a nice reawakening of the series and what people played it to be for.
People need to stop looking at all shooters like how they see next gen shooters. Some are just to help satisfy nostalgia and bring smiles to old memories. I'm pretty happy for what Duke Nukem is, and if I wanted a refined multiplayer experience with great CTF and KotH gameplay, I'll go play TF2.
And for the record, I'm far from a Duke Nukem fan, I enjoy mildly the game itself because the whole genre in story driven shooters dont excite me.
_________________
|
| Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:36 pm |
|
 |
|
Tazzaler
[n00b] Member
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:00 pm Posts: 5727 Location: Dakota, North
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
Played the demo
I lol'd hard.
_________________
|
| Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:19 pm |
|
 |
|
Reborn
[n00b] Member
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 11:00 pm Posts: 2117 Location: Sagittarius A*
|
 Re: DUKE NUKEM = FAIL??
Duke Nukem was always just ultra hyped at a time when there were shooters infinitely better than it. It's not surprising that the remake was shitty.
Back in the day when Duke Nukem was hailed as a great shooter (below the quake/doom series), one of the underdogs was "Shadow Warrior". Even in this day and age there is not a better single player shooter out there. If you've never played it you don't know what you're missing.
|
| Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:36 pm |
|
 |
|