Some jamoke ran down the street in our campus with an AK, fired a bunch of shots, ran into the library and up to the 6th floor of our major library and just off'ed himself. All-clear signal hasn't been given yet, so the whole campus is on lockdown as they're trying to find a possible accomplice. I heard certain buildings were being evacuated by SWAT.

Anyhoo, I just woke up to all the texts I was receiving, soooo class is cancelled, going to watch a movie :P

damn dude did he hit anyone?

If it was with an AK he should have just been able to spray and get six or seven head shots.

is it safe to assume this is the shooting your talking about...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_ut_gunman;_ylt=A0LEao4qM6JMLnsAdBWs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTNkNzRtazVsBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwOTI4L3VzX3V0X2d1bm1hbgRjY29kZQNtb3N0cG9wdWxhcgRjcG9zAzMEcG9zAzExBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3J5BHNsawNvZmZpY2lhbHN0ZXg-

i guess the head shot part was right atleast...

I love how you roll Chris

Well, good thing you don't like to read Chris! Dodged a bullet there.

Back from movie, Wall Street was pretty good :P
aaaand just received the all clear, there was no other shooter, and the guy shot in the general direction of, but not aiming at, people.
He was the only casualty.

Also, shooter day is the new snow day

Damn thats fucked up!! atleast he didnt hurt anybody else

The only shooter I like is Shooter McGavin, he eats pieces of shit like you for breakfast.

I lol'd in RL.

LOL I'm LOL'n in RL now cuz high lol'd in RL.

Listening to the Alex Jones Show, he's based out of Austin and he covered the shooting today, so interesting to hear what he has to say about it.

made my day.

At least no one was hurt by that wetback

The shooting was staged in order to prevent the promotion of the 2nd amendment on campus:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/amazing-coincidence-ut-shooting-cancels-pro-gun-speech.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Jones ... io_host%29..

Yeah....you're credible aren't you.

The funny thing is that I used wikipedia which is somewhat non-crediable to example that non-crediable source he used.

God I hope you were serious otherwise this post makes me look like an ass.

Did you read the cited sources in the article I posted? I'll grant that some of what he says is speculation, but this guy predicted much of what's going on, he even predicted 9/11 among other things and a lot of what he speculates about turns out to be true once things become declassified.

Sorry but once you start digging the whole N.W.O and Freemasonry scene your credibility becomes shit period. No matter how your prediction turned out years down the road.

How much do you yourself know about any of it? I only agree with what he says to a certain extent, but some things just feel like common sense to me judging by the sort of things that get left out of mainstream news but do get reported on by those same outlets in more obscure formats (like a little blurb in a random place or often right out in the open but with a different spin), or are suppressed by higher-ups even though articles or commentary are done only to be found at a much later and irrelevant date. Remove his Christian Revelatory bias and almost every little thing he talks about is true. Sure, the sensationalism of his reports with references to things like Bohemian Grove and worship of spiritual beings by the social elite kind-of ruin his credibility for many people, but the facts are the facts no matter who's reporting them.

Just because it's reported on an obscure format still doesn't mean it's true. Also I am not being ignorant by saying that, it's plausible and true.


Absolutely not.